I will be the first to admit that I am not a soccer fan. Other than Landon Donovan and hearing some about Mr. Altidore I know nothing about the U.S. soccer team and its past. I do know that the U.S. team in years past has not been a dominant force and even if it seems they tend to get better every World Cup, the U.S. team just can't get to the point of the upper echelon teams. This is the first World Cup where I feel I am watching as a fan, instead of just watching scores as I turn on ESPN. I find myself more and more excited to watch other countries play, especially Brazil and Germany. I notice that ESPN has the exclusive rights to the matches and most of the coverage. Yes, the coverage is of course more than usual when we talk about soccer, but as the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" you would assume they would have additional coverage. My question, "Is ESPN's coverage of the World Cup seem too much or not enough?
Every morning driving to work I listen to ESPN radio. While I am at work I listen to ESPN podcasts along with other news feeds and stories. What I am hearing and reading is a mixed review. ESPN itself of course seems to be discussing more of the World Cup, but even some of the podcast members ESPN employees think they are promoting it too much. I have heard things from "they are wasting money", to "the coverage will die when the World Cup is over", to "Many fans don't care". I assume of course ESPN has put a lot of money and time into the World Cup so of course the coverage will be there. Other sports networks also discuss the World Cup but not to the extent of ESPN. I have noticed companies like Sports Illustrated for example, have expanded their blogs, web pages, and apps to include additional information and discussions about the World Cup. Of course their coverage is not to the extent of ESPN. I have listened to sports talk radio shows in the last few weeks complaining about the excessive soccer coverage. One of these radio stations is in Minnesota. The funny thing is the State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Vikings are currently working together on bringing an MLS soccer team to the Twin Cities. For a local sports radio station to say that the soccer coverage is being overdone is kind of contradicting if the city your working in is trying to bring an MLS team into town isn't it?
I wonder though, what is going to happen when the World Cup is over? What happens if the U.S. team loses today (7/1/2014)? Will ESPN then back off the coverage or are they obligated to keep pushing on? As a bandwagon fan for a month or so I think the ESPN coverage is about right, not too much or too little.......but what do I know, I am not a true soccer fan.
Now what about the other side to the question? Many websites, blogs, etc. have said that ESPN hasn't done enough to cover the World Cup. They believe that overall the company has done an okay job, but that they are too quick to switch coverage from the World Cup to other sports like Baseball, NBA, or Tennis. Before the NBA Finals were over the World Cup coverage on ESPN was taking a back seat to the Miami Heat and the San Antonio Spurs. Now that the World Cup is the only main sporting event taking place, ESPN has really picked up its World Cup coverage. I found the link below and it actually does a great job of describing the ESPN coverage from the beginning of its coverage to now from a soccer expert point of view.
http://worldsoccertalk.com/2014/06/21/review-of-espns-world-cup-tv-coverage-after-week-1/
This article is from worldsoccertalk.com and they know a lot more about soccer than I do. I happened to stumble upon this article when I was looking through websites, blogs, twitter comments, etc. dealing with the idea that not enough coverage is being offered to soccer fans. This is just one example but their are many more that feel the same way.
To me, it seems like the fans who are bandwagon fans, fair weather fans, or not fans at all of soccer believe that ESPN has given too much coverage to the World Cup. True soccer fans, analysts, and experts seem to feel like ESPN is not having enough soccer coverage, and is breaking from their coverage too soon. Some also believe ESPN is jumping coverage so much from one channel to the next (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN News) that its to the point where fans are becoming annoyed with the Company.
In conclusion, I myself believe the ESPN World Cup coverage has been just about right. I like the background stories about certain teams and players. The commentary has been okay, but like I said, I am not a big soccer fan and I do not know who most of the commentators are, so who am I to judge. Many fans see ESPN's coverage of the World Cup as too much or too little and many of those fans are going to Facebook, Twitter, blogs, websites, etc. to vent their thoughts and ideas of the coverage..........By the way, "GO USA!